LUTTER
CONTRE LE HARCÈLEMENT MORAL
Les
médias ne sont pas neutres: les journalistes sont liés
à la direction par un lien de subordination s'ils sont salariés,
et par des contrats dans le cas contraire. A leur tour, les dirigeants
sont liés au monde politique et aux "lobbies" financiers.
Aujourd'hui, en France, une vraie chape de plomb pèse sur
l'information. Les affaires graves et les vraies critiques sont
étouffées dans la plupart des cas. Le harcèlement
professionnel est un très grave problème de société,
son analyse permet de comprendre la profondeur du gouffre qui nous
menace. Aussi, toute réflexion indépendante à
ce sujet est impitoyablement étouffée par le système
et ses "experts" officiels. La "loi contre le harcèlement"
que le monde politique nous prépare n'est pas une bonne loi.
Mais qui "aura le droit" de le dire?
QU' EST- CE QUE LE HARCÈLEMENT
AU TRAVAIL ?
Il s'agit d'un enchaînement, sur
une assez longue période, de propos et d'agissements hostiles
exprimés ou manifestés par une ou plusieurs personnes
envers une tierce personne, ceci au moins une fois par semaine.
Les agissements relevant du harcèlement visent à :
Empêcher la personne de s'exprimer
L'isoler
La déconsidérer auprès de ses collègues
La discréditer dans ses compétences et activités
professionnelles
Lui retirer ses outils, ressources, budgets….. de travail
Porter atteinte à sa situation économique
Porter atteinte à sa santé physique
LES CONSÉQUENCES DU HARCÈLEMENT
AU TRAVAIL
• POUR LA PERSONNE
Les personnes exposées à des
tensions spécifiques sur leur lieu de travail font état
d'un ensemble de symptômes :
- pleurs, déprime
- troubles de la mémoire
- abattement
- irritabilité, agitation
- perte d’intérêt
- isolement
- perte de confiance et d’estime en soi
- nausées
- difficultés à s’endormir
- troubles gastriques
- mal de dos, de nuque
- difficultés de respiration
- crises de sueur
- vertiges, tremblements
L'exposition prolongée aux attaques du harcèlement
va entraîner une atteinte parfois irréversible (santé
physique et psychique, perte d'emploi, déstabilisation familiale,
exclusion sociale) Certains se suicident pour y mettre fin.
• POUR L’ ENTREPRISE
Les coûts cumulés d’un
mauvais climat de travail sont énormes pour l’entreprise :
- absentéisme
- perte de production
- baisse de niveau de qualité
- coût du travail supplémentaire
- fluctuations du personnel
ACHP, Association
Contre le Harcèlement Professionnel
http://www.ifrance.com/achp , Tél. 0620601187 , Tél.
et Fax 0145830720
achp@ifrance.com , groupe de discussion: harcelement_professionnel@yahoogroupes.fr
AGAINST MENTAL HARRASSMENT
Like most workers, you have experienced
occasional job-related troubles. Is your employer treating you fairly
or legally? You may be concerned about workplace discrimination,
threads, attempts to weak your mental and physical health for nasty
reasons…
CONSEQUENCES OF HARRASMENT AT WORK
• FOR THE VICTIM
You might be exposed to such nasty and dangerous
consequences:
- cries, loneliness
- memory troubles
- despair
- agitation
- loss of interest
- isolation
- you don't trust in yourself anymore, doubts
- stomach troubles
- bad sleep
- back and neck pains
- breath difficulties
- sweat
- vertogo, tremblings
A too long exposition to harrassment can
cause fatal troubles(physical and mental health, job loss, family
destruction, social exclusion). Some people think their only way
to be free from that mental terrorism is suicide.
• FOR THE FIRM
The atmosphere can be very nasty, workers
feel fears or rage:
- some don't go to work as regularily as they did before
- loss of production
- loss of quality
- staff fluctuations
- bad public'social' image
A site will tell you how to defend and
protect you from that 'mental' terrorismr: http://www.nolo.com
DEATH OF THE MUSIC INDUSTRY
Despite
the year-end noise, music industry fading away, This is the time
of year when the music industry pats itself on the back. Journalists,
radio stations and others are getting pressure from labels to pick
their best albums of the year. The Grammy nominations are coming
up soon. Christmas gives the music industry the best sales of the
year.
It makes for a good but temporary buzz. This year, many in the industry
know the party is just about to end. A high-powered player in the
music industry for the past quarter century recently remarked privately
that "the music industry is over."
Not completely over, but certainly over as we know it.
People are going to still listen to music and go to concerts, but
everyone has finally realized - way too late - that the old way
really isn't going to work, no matter how hard the industry tries
to resist change.
For many fans, the response to this is "Duh." Downloading
and burning CDs has been a way of life for a generation of fans.
And with sales slumping, it's finally dawned on the industry that
no amount of bullying or bluster is going to make it go away. The
old world is gone.
The industry has tried to ignore downloading. Then it tried to quash
downloading. This year it tried copy-protection, which doesn't work.
In advance releases sent to the media and radio stations, it has
tried putting digital watermarks on the CDs to keep them from leaking
on the Internet. Others have gone more low-tech; Epitaph Records
sent out the new Nick Cave CD with a letter imploring the recipient
to please not leak the disc. It just can't go on; it has finally
reached critical mass. As noted here last week, concert ticket prices
are starting to come back to Earth.
But this year it has finally dawned on the industry as a whole that
the ship is sinking, and it's not about to stop.
The party already has ended for some; while the problems and layoffs
of Qwest and United Airlines have dominated headlines, the record
industry has quietly been "restructuring" even more -
that is, laying off people, dropping artists, slashing rosters.
Downloading and CD burning has won. High ticket and CD prices have
lost. By trying to maximize profits, the industry killed them.
CD releases have become like bad movies, the kind where they don't
let reviewers see them in the hopes of getting at least one week's
worth of good business. For CDs, the hit single pushed on radio
becomes the equivalent of the movie trailer and commercials, revealing
just the best part of the product. By the time you shell out your
money, you've been had. The industry just hopes for a big hit in
first-week sales before word-of-mouth reveals the disc to be a dog.
Oddly enough, Prince - widely ridiculed for turning his back on
the record industry years ago - ends up looking damn near clairvoyant.
He established an online music club; he's been releasing his own
music and keeping the profits. Those who mocked him for breaking
away a few years back would now kill to be in his position.
Radio programming has become overly formatted. Talk shows and morning
news shows have become the new radio - the new place for performers
to let the public know they have new music out there. Elvis Costello,
Bruce Springsteen, Delbert McClinton, Tom Petty, Peter Gabriel and
more. Aerosmith's Steven Tyler is appearing on the Disney Channel's
Lizzie McGuire. Led Zeppelin, The Clash and The Who get high-profile
audio exposure through automobile ads. The classic-rock programming
inside Mervyn's and Michael's stores is better than what you hear
on the radio.
Clear Channel has quietly put its concert division on the market,
looking for interested buyers. The timing clearly isn't good. Word
is out that Concerts West made another low-ball bid for House of
Blues Concerts, which turned it down.
DVD audio and Surround Sound mixes are keeping audiophiles interested
in the music scene, but the numbers are still tiny. They're small
even for conventional music DVDs. Paul McCartney's Back in the U.S.
DVD set a record for first-week sales of a music DVD - with sales
of 61,000. As noted here a few weeks back, Spiderman sold 11 million
its first week out.
This is where someone is supposed to come up with a brilliant solution.
But there isn't one. All there is is an ugly winter lying ahead,
and the certainty that by next year at this time, everything will
be different. No one knows just how different.
Mark Brown is the popular music critic. Brownm@RockyMountain News.com
or (303) 892-2674
TOTAL SYSTEM
 Inquietant
: les grandes compagnies commerciales, en viennent peu à
peu à exercer leur propre modes de contrôle sur ceux
que lon appelle désormais les « consommateurs
», et participent à leur tour au progressif encerclement
de la population, se faisant, parfois même, les complices
de lÉtat dans sa tentation de surveillance et de contrôle
global de la société. Notamment lorsque ces compagnies
se font le vecteur, via la publicité et les mass media, dune
idéologie qui se voudrait libertaire, et qui fait lapologie
de cette société de consommation en tant quexemple
ultime de civilisation de la Liberté. Cette croyance repose
sur la thèse néo-libérale selon laquelle la
liberté économique offrirait aux individus le choix
de ce qui leur convient, selon leurs désirs réels
ou suscités, leur personnalité propre, etc. Cette
idéologie de la « personnalisation » est en réalité
fondatrice dune nouvelle société du «
choix », par opposition à luniformité
forcée qui règnerait dans les régimes totalitaires
traditionnels (lire Gilles Lipovetsky, Lère du vide)
; Chaque société a certes ses propres modes dintégration
et codes sociaux. Notre société est une société
dans laquelle la condition dintégration est la possession,
et le critère de réussite sociale est l'accumulation.
Dans laquelle fortune fait force de vertu, dans laquelle chacun
est jugé non pas sur ses qualités humaines, mais bien
en grande partie sur ses biens matériels, son capital, motif
de honte ou de fierté sociale par excellence. Dès
lors, « choix » ne signifie pas « liberté
», lorsquil devient impossible de ne pas acheter et
de ne pas choisir. Entre un Tee-Shirt Z et un Tee-Shirt W, je dois
de toutes façons choisir un Tee-Shirt ; entre un presse-purée
X ou un presse-purée Y, je dois de toute façon choisir
un presse-purée. Ces "choix" ne sont pas motivés
par une vision rationnelle de leur utilité. C'est la société
qui m'y contraint -non pas par la force, mais par la pression sociale,
pression sociale alimentée par la publicité et les
médias. Sans quoi je suis voué à lobsolescence,
à la ringardise, etc., autant de maux qui me condamnent à
la moquerie et, plus ou moins, participent de ma mise au ban de
la société. Des condamnations sociales, en somme,
mais qui ne sont certes pas moins dissuasives que des condamnations
pénales. Notre civilisation du Progrès nous oblige
ainsi à la consommation éternelle, ne serait-ce que
pour permettre le renouvellement continu de nos biens auquel elle
nous condamne. C'est là une forme de totlitarisme, ou même
de terrorisme, qui nous force par la peur à commettre des
achats que nous n'aurions sans doute pas fait. Un terrorisme de
la consommation et du Progrès obligatoire, de la "mise
à jour", de la modernisation. Où est la liberté
des individus lorsque leur énergie est consacrée à
la satisfaction de besoins superflus, à la fabrication et
à lachat de gadgets ? Les individus se trouvent enfermés
dans la société de consommation sans aucune échappatoire,
sinon la marginalité, qui est la pire des condamnations sociale.
Notre société est une société où
les individus nont pas le choix. Une société
libertaire en apparence, totalitaire en fait. Voilà ce qui
peut-être nous guette.
SAMI.
No good news: big companies exert their
own control on what is called "consumers", and from their
untouchable big towers they unchain populations, being even complices
of the government in its temptation to get total control. Notably
when these companies are vector,via advertisements and mass medias,
of an ideology that would insure "democracy", and that
makes apology of this consumer's system as an ultimate civilization
example of freedom. This belief is based on the néo-liberalist
thesis saying that the economic liberty would offer to individuals
the choice of what they want and what they need, according to real
desires and personality. This ideology of "personnalisation"
is in reality pretennding to create a new world of "choice",
by opposition to the forced uniformity of facism or traditional
systems. Each society has its own integration system and its own
social codes. Our societty (occidental) is a world in which the
integration's condition is possession and in which the social success
criterion is accumulation and performances. In which fortune is
a force, and everyone is judged not on his human qualities, but
largely on his material possessions, his capital, motive of shame
or even social pride. But choice does not mean freedom, when it
becomes impossible not to buy and not to choose.Between a "Z"
Tee-Shirt and a "W" Tee-Shirt, I have to choose a Tee-Shirt;
between a "X" machine or a "Y" machine, I have
to choose a machine
These "choices" are not motivated
by a rational vision of their usefulness. It's business companies
(design agnecies, business concils, distributors and so on
)
that push the masses, and they can use social pressure created by
themselves, social pressure itself pushed by advertisements and
medias. If I don't follow the "mainstream", I am "out"
or sick, or junk
such judgements, prononced or not, condamning
me to the mockery and throwing me away from society, is a machine
of death. Social condemnations are not less dissuasive than penal
condemnations. Our civilization of "Progress" promise
an "eternal consumption". This is a kind of totlitarism,
or even of terrorism, that forces populations by the fear to commit
purchases that we would probably not do. An terrorism of consumption,
an eternal "update" of our brains, bodies and possessions.
This is "modernization". Where is freedom, for individuals
using, wasting their energy to get and update superfluous needs,
to devote their life for manufacture and gadgets? People are found
enclosed into a consumption's society without any exit, the only
- and final - exit being marginality, which is the worse social
condemnation. Our society is a world where individuals do not have
choice. A world of fake freedom. The democratic system is facist
in fact. Here is the "new version" we are buying in perfect
consciousness. We are voting for dictators who prepare the "best
total system". Great irony of history
MAGAZINE : COMBAT,
la presse d'état insolente existe toujours !
 Combat
est un magazine édité avec l'aide
du Ministère de l'emploi et de la solidarié de la
Mission interministerielle de lutte contre la drogue et les toxicomanies
et de Solidarité sida. Bref, un outil de communication officiel.
Et pourtant, la seule lecture du N°28 de juin 2002 est édifiante
: vous tenez entre les mains un outil de controverse puissant. Un
brûllot dans lequel démonte le mauvais traitement médiatique
du livre deThierry Meyssan, L'effroyable Impossture.Quelles
preuves les journalistes disposent-ils pour lapider l'idée
de la manipulation officielle autour de l'attentat ? Auraient-ils
oublier dde saines lectures ciomme Le grand secret de Barjavel,
qui dévoilait dèjà les effarantes possibilités
des étatas prèts à sacrifier leurs propres
petites mains ? Même offenssiveface à la torure en
prison, et l'état se retrouve même complice de laisser
d'odieux patrons exploiter les handicapés pour de la manutention.
Sexualité et prostitution, l'idéologie pourrie du
sport de haut nivea
des sujets à polémiques
qui sont traité avec un véritable savoir-faire journalistique.
Bien documenté,d'une lecture captivant e, voilci le genre
de magazine qu'on aimerait voir faire de l'ombre à de la
prétendue presse politico-sociale. Pourvue que ça
dure ! Le site : http://www.vih.org/combat/
Combat is a magazine
edited with the assistance of the official health and solidarity
Ministries (drug and Aids). Yes, this is an official communication
tool. And nevertheless, the reading of #28 alone (June 2002) is
quite a dream: you are holding in your hands a powerful controversial
tool. Summary: the bad mediatic processing about the book of Thierry
Meyssan, "The frightful Impossture", who pretends that
the 11 september is an official manipulation.What journalists evidences
have-they to throw away the idea of the official manipulation around
the 11 september attack? What proof Ameraica has? Where are the
plane's pieces, the deads and so on
Did they forget good readings
like "The great secret" of Barjavel,book that already
talked about the scaring possibilities of the governments which
can sacrifice their own soldiers and servants? Same offenssive for
the use of torure in prisons. The government is even found guilty
to leave odious bosses exploiting paraplegics for manual tasks.
Sexuality and prostitution, the nasty ideology of high level sport
and other subjects to controversy are processed with a real journalistic
know-how. Well documented, a captivating reading, here is the kind
of magazine that one would like to see making the shade to the so-called
politico-social press.The site: http://www.vih.org/combat/
|